Trustman provides premier legal support services to corporate law departments,Attorneys and law firms using our unique Global Sourcing model. Ingrained in our All-round Excellence culture is our fanatical commitment to quality and rapid responsiveness to client needs.  That enables us to consistently perform at the highest levels of excellence is our qualified staff of highly trained and exceptionally motivated attorneys/ paralegal.    

Download our Legal Outsourcing India presentation             

Legal Outsourcing (LPO) are the following.

Intellectual Property Law, Patent, trademark, Contract Monitoring Outsourcing, Contract Management Outsourcing, Document Review Outsourcing, Electronic Discovery Outsourcing, Litigation Support, Medico-Legal Outsourcing, Medical Malpractice Litigation Support Outsourcing, Litigation Document Management Outsourcing, Bankruptcy Filing Outsourcing, Legal Pleadings Outsourcing, Legal document outsourcing,  Legal Pleadings & Documentation, Legal Research Outsourcing, Paralegal Outsourcing Services, Contract Drafting Services & Contract Monitoring/Management, Document Review, Electronic Discovery and Litigation Services, Bankruptcy Filing, Pleadings & Documentation, Legal Research, Paralegal Support Services, Contract Drafting Outsourcing, Patent drafting, Simple legal filings, Legal Publications, Proof reading, Litigation support.

BANGALORE, India — Nearly two years ago, President Obamarankled many people here when he said that American tax law unfairly benefited companies that created jobs in Bangalore and punished companies that hired in Buffalo.

On Tuesday, however, the president’s commerce secretary offered a friendlier message: Let’s do business. In his second stop during a weeklong tour of India, the secretary, Gary Locke, said he wanted to help American companies sell planes, tractors and power equipment to create jobs in the United States while also helping to develop India.

New York State has gone even further. It set up an office in New Delhi last year and is organizing a series of investment conferences in New Delhi, Mumbai and Bangalore this spring, aimed at Indian companies who want to expand to the United States or work as partners with a New York company.

The office is led by Kaviraj Singh, a Delhi lawyer who has lived and worked in New York. He said he planned to use the office to tie New York businesses “into a network that will make you feel as though you’ve always been here.”

for details click http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/09/business/global/09locke.html?_r=1&src=busln

- Conciliation

- Preparing and presenting the case before arbitrator

- Domestic and International Arbitration

- Enforcement of Awards in India

- Enforcement of Awards outside India

http://www.trustman.org/lawfirm/arbitration_lawfirm_india.htm

1. Property is acquired by way of purchase or inheritance for the person’s bona fide residential use and transferred by way of sale. (No restrictions are placed on the number of residential properties that can be acquired/disposed of under the general permission except what is mentioned against condition 6 below).

2. Consideration for the property purchased is met out of foreign exchange remitted from abroad through normal banking channels or funds withdrawn from the purchaser’s NRE/FCNR account maintained with a bank in India.

3.  Property purchased is not let out except where it is not immediately required for the purchaser’s own residential use.

4.  A declaration is submitted to Reserve Bank (Central Office) about such acquisition in form IPI 7 within a period of 90 days from such acquisition/final payment of purchase consideration along with a certified copy of the document evidencing the transaction and bank certificate regarding the consideration paid.

5. Income accruing by way of rent or sale proceeds of the property or income arising out of investment of such proceeds is credited to the person’s NRO account (if the property is held by a non-resident foreign citizen of Indian origin) or to the Resident Rupee Account i.e. Q.A.22 Account (if the property is held by a foreign citizen of Indian origin resident in India) with a bank in India.

6.  In respect of residential properties purchased on or after 26th May 1993, Reserve Bank would consider applications for the repatriation of sale proceeds up to the consideration amount remitted in foreign exchange for the acquisition of the property( only up to two such properties ) provided the sale takes place after three years from the date of final purchase deed or from the date of payment of final installment of consideration amount, whichever is later. Applications for the purpose should be made to Reserve Bank (Central Office) in form IPI 8 within 90 days of the sale of the property.

Some of the services provided by the firm:

1. Commercial Taxation
2. Excise Duty
3. Customs duty
4. Sales Tax
5. Corporate and Personnel Income Tax
6. Off-shore Tax Planning
7. Company and Partnership Income and Capital gains tax *
8. Tax effectiveness of commercial ventures
9. International tax Planning

Law Firms India- practice area- taxation

AND  WHEREAS the said resolution recommends inter alia that all States give favourable consideration to the said Model Law when they enact or revise  their  laws,  in view of the need for uniformity  of  the  law applicable  to alternatives to paper-based method of communication and  storage of information.

AND  WHEREAS  it  is considered necessary to give effect to  the  said resolution and to promote efficient delivery of Government services by means of reliable electronic records. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Fifty-first Year of the Republic of India as follows:- for more click

The Government Relations and Regulatory Affairs group at Trustman Law Firm offers a broad range of services to those engaged in lobbying, advocacy and regulatory affairs. Law Firm has the expertise to serve in a number of roles, from providing direct, hands-on lobbying to supporting the efforts of other lobbyists on legislation, regulations and administrative policy. Law Firm also provide services in the areas of administrative law and regulatory affairs, and law firm regularly assist clients in the increasingly complex area of compliance with state, federal and local campaign finance and ethics requirements.

Law Firm’s understanding of both the political and legal systems, and law firm’s combined expertise in both, allows it to bridge the gulf that often separates the two and to tailor cost-effective solutions which respond to the needs and capacities of each client. Law Firm can help to construct a government relations component for an organization from the ground up. Law Firm can develop lobbying strategies and solutions on specific issues; and law firm can support clients’ own lobbying efforts with the legal analyses and services that can make the difference between success and failure.

Law Firm’s goal is to help all of its clients succeed cost-effectively, whether that entails enhancing the effectiveness of those who already engage in lobbying and advocacy activities, or introducing clients to legislative and regulatory alternatives which complement more traditional legal approaches.

Our Clients

This practice group provides services to professional associations, businesses, trade associations, other nonprofit organizations, local governments, political organizations, and individuals.

In a rather stunning move, Google recently purchased the popular video site YouTube The question many are asking is how Google will deal with the potential copyright violations on the site?

To show you how much the Internet has changed in a relatively short amount of time, it is important to look back at the last big public medium that had copyright issues. In this case, we are talking about Napster. As you know, Napster was a system where music could be traded by people for free. This, of course, drove the record labels and artists crazy. If people were trading the music for free, royalties and revenues were not being produced. To quell the uprising, the music industry went after Napster and even individual users, claiming that the copyright for the musical pieces was being violated. As you also know, the record companies won the fight.

Now consider YouTube. From just about any angle, YouTube appears to be the Napster of the online video industry. The obvious difference is that many people will simply upload their own videos and creations to the site. In such circumstances, it’s obvious that nobody can complain that there is a copyright violation because people have voluntarily put it up on the site. The problem that arises, however, is when people go ahead and upload videos and other matter from television, DVDs, and so on. Based on the various legal precedents set in the Napster case, it would appear that copyright claims can be made against YouTube.

So, why would Google risk purchasing YouTube? Does it really want to risk being sued to high heaven? Google assures everyone that the copyright problems are no big deal, but its rumored action tell a different story. Depending upon the media you are reading, Google has supposedly set aside between $200 and $500 million dollars to deal with copyright claims. That is an absolute ton of money and represents a certain lack of faith by Google on the copyright issues. So, will Google actually end up paying out most of this money? The chances seem slim. To understand why, we need to find an answer to the question of what makes YouTube different from Napster?

Ironically, the law really has not changed in any noticeable way. The primary thing that is different is us as a society. It goes without saying that the record industry took a beating on the public relations front when it started suing kids in relation to the Napster litigation. The backlash from that process led to a situation where companies began reassessing such heavy handed tactics. In concert with this, online music sites where you could buy individual songs proved a huge success. Throw in the Ipod and the future became clear. For mainstream entertainment groups, the internet was no longer a nasty word.

Instead of trying to beat down companies like YouTube with copyright claims, entertainment groups will seek out mutually profitable solutions. In fact, Google has already announced such deals and you can expect a lot more in the future. Will there still be copyright disputes? Sure, but they should be fairly nominal. The real question is what will happen to the concept of copyright as it is applied to the net. Although hardly a psychic, I think I am hardly out of line in predicting it will change dramatically over the next five to 10 years. In fact, I tend to think the legal concept of copyright may be applied by a more specific set of rules applicable just to the net. For many online sites, this would prove to be a positive move.

Gerard Simington is with FindAnAttorneyForMe.com – an online intellectual property law information and attorney directory.
This article is free for republishing
Source: http://www.articlealley.com

DISTRICT FORUM of Delhi with Address & jurisdiction:

Law Firms India
Debt collection India
Patent law firms in India

(2) Whoever commits hacking shall be punished with imprisonment up to three years, or with fine which may extend up to two lakh rupees, or with both.

Law Firms India

Lawyers India